Compilation Anthropometric Characteristic Norm of Iranian Males and Females Athletes with Disabilities

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 National Paralympic committee

2 Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences - University of Tehran

3 Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences - Alzahra University

Abstract

Background and Aim: Using anthropometric data can affect selecting the talented athletes, purposeful sporting guidance of newcomers, improving athletic performance, standardizing equipment and preventing injury. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to present a norm of anthropometric characteristics in Iranian athletes with disabilities.
Materials and Methods: This research was a descriptive study. The population of this study was all athletes with disabilities participated in the national championship competitions in different sports. 188 male athletes (age 30.23±12.21 year) and 109 female athletes (age 30.27±3.22 year) participated in this study. Mean, standard deviation and normal range of values were calculated. Analysis was performed using SPSS version 18.
Results: Normative data in selected parameters are: arm girth relaxed 33.04(±4.89) for male and 28.51(±4.88) for female, arm girth flexed and tensed M:35.7(±4.94) and F:30.32(±5.09), biacormial breath M:42.11(±3.9) and F:27.91(±2.44), humerus breadth M:7.19(±0.59) and F:6.31(±0.54), humerus length (acromiale-radiale) M:31.9(±2.35) and F:29.31(±1.63), forearm length (radiale-stylion) M:25.74(±1.64) and F:24.05(±1.86), hand length (mid-sylion-dactylion) M:18.67(±1.64) and F:17.91(±1.14), arm span M:178.59(±8.09) and F:155.11(±10.53), sitting height M:91.57(±5) and F:80.04(±6.19), stretch stature M:171.25(±10.15) and F:155.67(±12.18) and brachial index M:81.2%(±4.31) and F:82.45%(±6.82).
Conclusion: These findings can be useful for purposeful sporting guidance of newcomers to choosing suitable sports with considering biomechanics, ergonomics, performance and injury prevention aspects.
Key words: Norm, Anthropometry, Sport for people with disabled

Keywords

Main Subjects


Ackland T R., Ridder J H. (2009). Chapter: 7. Applied Anatomy And Biomechanics In Sport, Ed Ackland T R. , ‎ Elliott B, ‎ Bloomfield J. US: Human Kinetics. Ed2.
Ackland TRLohman TGSundgot-Borgen JMaughan RJMeyer NLStewart ADMüller W. (2012). Current Status of Body Composition Assessment in Sport. Sports Med; 42 (3): 227-249.
Bahr R, Krosshaug T. (2005). Understanding Injury Mechanisms: A Key Component of Preventing Injuries in Sport. Br J Sports Med. 39: 324-329.
Chapman D, Fulton S, Gough C. (2010). Anthropometric and physical performance characteristics of elite male wheelchair basketball athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 24(1):1.
Dingley A, Pyne D, Burkett B. (2015). Relationships between Propulsion and Anthropometry in Paralympic Swimmers. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 10: 978-985.
Fernández-Romero J J, Suárez H V, Cancela J M. (2016). Anthropometric Analysis and [1] Performance Characteristics to Predict Selection in Young Male and Female Handball Players. The Journal of Physical Education. 22: 283-289.
Granados C, Yanci J, Badiola A, Iturricastillo A, Otero M,Olasagasti J, Bidaurrazaga I, M. Gil S.   (2015). Anthropometry and Performance in Wheelchair Basketball. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 29(7):1812–182.
Haydon D.S, Pinder R.A, Grimshaw P.N, Robertson W.S. (2016). Elite wheelchair rugby: a quantitative analysis of chair configuration in Australia. Sports Eng. 19: 177–184.
Massidda M, Toselli S, Brasili P, Calò C M. (2013). Somatotype of Elite Italian Gymnasts. Coll. Antropol. 37 (3): 853–857.
Meeuwisse WH, Tyreman H, Hagel B, Emery C. (2007). A Dynamic Model of Etiology in Sport Injury: The Recursive Nature of Risk and Causation. Clin J Sport Med 17: 215–219.
Molik B, Morgulec-Adamowicz N, Kosmol A, Perkowski K, Bednarczuk G, Skowroński W,Gomez M, eat al. (2015). Game Performance Evaluation in Male Goalball Players. Journal of Human Kinetics. 48: 43-51.
Oh Y T, Burkett B, Osborough C, Formosa D, Payton C. (2013). London 2012 Paralympic swimming: passive drag and the classification system. . Br J Sports Med. 47: 838–843.
 Radu L E,  Popovici I M,  Puni A R. (2015). Comparison of Anthropometric Characteristics between Athletes and Non-Athletes.  Social and Behavioral Sciences. 191: 495-499.
Sa´Nchez-Mun˜oz C, Sanz D, Zabala M. (2007). Anthropometric Characteristics, Body Composition and Somatotype of Elite Junior Tennis Players. Br J Sports Med. 41:793–799.
Siahkouhian M, Hedayatneja M. (2010). Correlations of Anthropometric and Body Composition Variables with the Performance of Young Elite Weightlifters. Journal of Human Kinetics. 25: 125-131.
Spathis JG, Connick MJ, Beckman EM, Newcombe PA, Tweedy S. (2015). Reliability and validity of a talent identification test battery for seated and standing Paralympic throws. J Sports Sci. 33(8): 863-871
Tsolakis C. Vagenas G. (2010). Anthropometric, Physiological and Performance Characteristics of Elite and Sub‐Elite Fencers. Journal of Human Kinetics. 23: 89‐95.
Utkualp N, Ercan I. (2015). Anthropometric Measurements Usage in Medical Sciences.  Biomed Research International. 4: 1-7.
Van De  Vliet P, Broad E, Strupler M . (2011) .Chapter:10. In The Paralympic Athlete, Ed. Y.C. Vandlandewijck and W.R Thompson, UK:Wiley-Blackwell. 
Visnapuu M, Jürimäe T. (2009). Relations of Anthropometric Parameters with Scores on Basic and Specific Motor Tasks In Young Handball Players. Percept Mot Skills, 108: 670-676.
[1]. Wheelchair Basketball
2. International Wheelchair Basketball Federation
3. Block